Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to OP3 MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables querying and analyzing marketing data from Google Analytics 4, Search Console, YouTube, and optionally Google Ads and Meta Ads, stored in a unified DuckDB database, via natural language in Claude.
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides statistical analysis and usage tracking for Claude Code, enabling users to query daily/monthly stats, compare users, analyze trends, detect anomalies, and generate usage reports through natural language.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search millions of podcasts, read and search episode transcripts with timestamps and speakers, and access chapters, soundbites, Podcasting 2.0 tags, value-for-value data, feed health, and index statistics through 36 tools.
      36
      40 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables querying Rybbit Analytics data directly through MCP-compatible clients like Claude Code. It provides tools for monitoring website statistics, user sessions, error logs, funnels, and performance metrics via natural language.
      43
      15 npm
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Connects Google Analytics 4 data to Claude, Cursor and other MCP clients, enabling natural language queries of website traffic, user behavior, and analytics data with access to 200+ GA4 dimensions and metrics.
      10
      1,541 PyPI
      243
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 22 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct analytical dimension (downloads, unique listeners, geography, apps, devices, retention, overlap, raw rows), and the descriptions explicitly say when to prefer one over another. The few superficially similar tools (op3_show_downloads vs op3_query_downloads vs op3_episode_downloads, or op3_app_share vs op3_benchmark_apps vs op3_global_app_share) are clearly differentiated by scope and intent.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All 22 tools use a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern uniformly prefixed with op3_. No camelCase, no mixed conventions, and the names read predictably.

    Tool Count4/5

    22 tools is on the heavier side but justified by a genuinely broad analytics domain spanning downloads, listeners, geography, apps, devices, retention, and raw verification surfaces. Each tool earns its place rather than being redundant.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface covers the full analytic lifecycle: identifier resolution, show/episode metadata, aggregate metrics, audience composition, breakdowns, trends, cohort retention, raw escape hatches, and a diagnostic verification tool. No obvious dead ends for the stated podcast-analytics purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues