Google Photos MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Google Photos MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to search, list, preview, and export photos from Apple Photos, Google Photos Picker sessions, and local Google Takeout archives using native search and metadata inspection.3 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to automatically organize Google Photos and Google Drive files, including deduplication and archiving.638 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to search, inspect, organize, and export photos from a local Apple Photos library using natural language, including scene labels, text, faces, places, and albums.13227 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to search, browse, and retrieve metadata and images from your Google Photos library. It supports content-based filtering, album listing, and location extraction via STDIO and HTTP transports.44-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables ChatGPT users to search and browse a private photo library, inspect metadata, and receive real image previews through read-only tools, while keeping encrypted sessions server-side.MIT

CoreViz MCPofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceExposes a visual library with semantic search, tagging, editing, and management of photos as tools for AI agents like Claude Code.13 npm49MIT
TDQS
Scored across 29 tools
The set is largely distinct: picker session tools form a clear multi-step workflow, album tools follow CRUD plus sharing, and media tools separate app-owned from picked items. A few pairs could be conflated (search_library vs list_app_media; upload_from_url vs create_album_with_media), but their descriptions resolve the boundaries well.
Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (list_albums, create_album, update_media_description, save_to_library). The deviations are minor: auth_status and quota_status are noun-like, and raw is a bare escape hatch, but they do not make the naming unpredictable.
At 29 tools, the surface is well past the 25-tool threshold and over double the typical well-scoped range. Although many operations are genuinely distinct, the set would be easier to navigate with consolidation, especially around upload entry points and singleton admin/status tools.
The domain is broadly covered: upload, search/list, media detail/download, album create/read/update/share/enrich, and the picker bridge to the full library. The main missing named operation is delete_album, and media deletion is impossible in the underlying API; raw provides an escape hatch for such gaps.