Skip to main content
Glama
thenavidm

Flodesk MCP Server

by thenavidm
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Flodesk MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • email-engine

      Kadri-cloud
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search, read, organize, draft, send, and schedule email through a scoped token, with actions journaled and reversible. It also supports proposal queues, approval workflows, and undo operations for safe mailbox automation.
      15 npm
      8
      Apache 2.0

    • EmailOctopus MCP Server

      OfirOhan
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to manage mailing lists and contacts, read campaign reports with per-link clicks, and trigger automations. Supports lookups and updates by email address, tag and status management, and destructive operations with client confirmation.
      13
      MIT
    • Axonity Flow MCP Server by AxonityAI

      Axonity Flow MCP Serverofficial

      AxonityAI
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to author and manage workflows, agents, tools, skills, policies, and reference docs in an Axonity tenant via the public REST API, with guardrails preventing direct publishing and secret exposure.
      100
      99 npm
      MIT

    • Fluent WordPress MCP Server

      thenavidm
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and terminal workflows to read FluentCRM contacts, campaigns and automations, FluentCommunity spaces, feeds, comments and member analytics, and Fluent Forms definitions, submissions and stats, while applying only reviewed native changes. It supports multiple isolated private site profiles authenticated with WordPress Application Passwords, and provides approval-gated cross-plugin batches plus bounded, privately stored snapshots.
      54
      16 npm
      AGPL 3.0

    • fal.ai MCP Server

      thenavidm
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to discover current fal.ai model schemas and pricing, submit only approved generation batches, manage assets, collections, tags, characters, and CDN access settings, and use isolated private account profiles through shared validated tools.
      66
      45 npm
      AGPL 3.0
    • Arsel MCP Server by Arsel-SA

      Arsel MCP Serverofficial

      Arsel-SA
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to read and manage contacts, lists, tags, events, templates, campaigns and message logs in an Arsel organization, and to draft email, SMS, push and in-app campaigns for review. It is read-and-draft only, so agents can create and update records but cannot send, schedule or delete anything.
      59
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.6/5.0

    Scored across 32 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools target distinct resources, but list_custom_fields and list_all_custom_fields appear to do the same thing, and preview_subscriber_batch, submit_subscriber_batch, and batch_create_or_update_subscribers have blurry boundaries around batch subscriber operations. The Canva/Studio publish pair is also similar, though distinguishable by source.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Nearly all names follow a predictable verb_noun snake_case pattern (get_subscriber, list_webhooks, create_webhook, add_subscriber_to_segments). Minor deviations like get_oauth_userinfo and the noun-heavy _batch/_page variants keep it just short of perfect.

    Tool Count3/5

    At 32 tools this is on the heavy side for a single server, exceeding the typical 3-15 sweet spot. The domain (subscribers, campaigns, segments, workflows, webhooks, custom fields, publishing) is broad enough to justify many, but several meta/utility tools (get_operation_schema, list_accounts, get_oauth_userinfo, preview_subscriber_batch) add weight.

    Completeness3/5

    Coverage is uneven: webhooks have full CRUD and subscribers are richly handled, but campaigns only support listing (no get/create/update/delete), and segments and custom fields lack update/delete operations. These notable gaps would leave agents at dead ends for common lifecycle tasks.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources