Skip to main content
Glama
thenavidm

Dub MCP Server

by thenavidm
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Dub MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Flodesk MCP Server

      thenavidm
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and terminal clients to manage subscribers, draft campaigns, workflows, custom fields, webhooks, and private account profiles with shared read/write safeguards.
      32
      23 npm
      AGPL 3.0

    • qrtap-mcp

      IlyaShurf
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to run a QRTap workspace end to end: create and edit QR codes and short links, publish public pages, moderate guest reviews, manage booking requests, and configure conditional redirects, with anonymous scan analytics. It also supports bulk code issuance and print-ready PNG, SVG, and PDF artifacts.
      20
      478 npm
      MIT

    • linkbit-mcp

      yutotanakastar
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to shorten links, bulk-create URLs, generate QR codes, and retrieve click analytics through MCP clients such as Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, and n8n.
      36 npm
      MIT
    • esyURL MCP server by esyurl

      esyURL MCP serverofficial

      esyurl
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to create, update, organize, and delete short links; render styled QR codes; route visitors by device or country; and read click and scan statistics. Agents can also manage groups and custom domains while changing destinations without breaking printed QR codes or shared short URLs.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.9/5.0

    Scored across 61 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target a distinct resource+action, and descriptions clarify boundaries well. Some pairs invite confusion—create_link vs upsert_link vs bulk_create_links, and preview_link_batch vs submit_link_batch vs bulk_create_links—but they are separable with careful reading.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Predominantly consistent verb_noun snake_case (create_tag, list_folders, delete_domain, bulk_update_links). Minor deviations: mixing get_ vs retrieve_ (get_link vs retrieve_partner_links, retrieve_partner_analytics) and a few irregular forms like get_links_count.

    Tool Count2/5

    61 tools is very heavy for a single server, well into the too-many range. The domain (links, tags, folders, domains, partners, commissions, payouts, bounties, discount codes, customers, tracking, plus meta-tools) is genuinely broad, which softens but does not justify the volume.

    Completeness4/5

    Strong lifecycle coverage: full CRUD for links, tags, folders, and domains, plus partner/commission/bounty workflows. Minor gaps exist—payouts are list-only, discount codes lack an update, and there is no explicit create_customer (customers appear upserted via tracking).

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources