Danh sách cấu hình webhook

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only restates the listing action and does not mention pagination, output format, permissions, ordering, or any side effects. There is no contradiction with annotations, but there is also very little added behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short and front-loaded, with the key action and resource stated immediately. The bilingual second sentence is redundant but not problematic; it adds minimal length without meaningful new information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

This is a simple zero-parameter read-only tool, so a very brief description is somewhat acceptable. However, without an output schema or behavioral details, an agent does not know what fields the returned webhook configs contain or whether any response-specific considerations apply. It is adequate for basic invocation but not fully complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so the baseline is 4. There are no parameters for the description to explain, and no additional parameter-level semantics are needed.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Liệt kê' / 'List') and the resource ('webhook đã cấu hình' / 'webhook configs'). This is sufficiently specific to distinguish it from sibling tools like create_webhook, delete_webhook, webhook_logs, and webhook_stats.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance about when to use this tool versus alternatives such as webhook_logs or webhook_stats. The verb 'list' implies a read operation, but the description does not provide explicit context, prerequisites, or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.