Twill
Related Servers
Alternatives to Twill
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables controlling your own Linux desktop machines from any MCP-capable LLM client, with opt-in agent capabilities for shell, filesystem, processes, screenshots, system info, and input injection.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables full Linux desktop control including windows, mouse, keyboard, clipboard, audio, screenshots, OCR, accessibility, and system management through MCP-compatible AI agents.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives AI agents local Linux desktop control through tools for screenshots, accessibility, mouse, keyboard, and reliable text input.14MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceExposes Anthropic's computer-use action surface (screenshot, click, move, keyboard, clipboard, batch) against a persistent desktop display via MCP stdio protocol. Enables AI agents to control a virtual desktop environment through natural language instructions.24MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to automate a Linux desktop natively on Wayland, with 68 tools for screen capture, input simulation, browser automation, OCR, accessibility, media, audio, clipboard, notifications, filesystem, system, memory, and network operations through the MCP protocol.MIT
- FlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceCross-platform desktop automation MCP server that lets AI agents capture screenshots, run OCR with UI-element classification, control mouse/keyboard, and launch programs on Linux, macOS, and Windows.201-
TDQS
Scored across 46 tools
Several tools have muddy boundaries: textile_get_state and textile_get_sensory_state describe nearly the same blackboard snapshot, and file_op is a catch-all overlapping file_list, file_find, file_stat, file_chmod, and inotify. run_command also overlaps with launch_app, polkit_pkexec, and process management, making selection error-prone.
Most tools follow a clear domain_prefix + action pattern: packagekit_*, polkit_*, process_*, file_*, inotify_*, sensors_*, and textile_get_*. The main blemishes are file_op, a noun-style exception, and a handful of unprefixed tools like search_web, launch_app, and run_command, but overall the convention is recognizable.
46 tools is far beyond a typical well-scoped MCP server. The set spans files, processes, packages, polkit, inotify, sensors, web fetching, screen capture, tests, and internal Textile state, which feels like several specialized servers crammed into one.
Coverage is broad but uneven: package management and polkit are quite complete, while file operations lack delete/move/copy tools and process management lacks a dedicated start tool. Some gaps can be papered over with run_command, but the surface has clear dead ends for a supposed system administration toolkit.