Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Twill

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables controlling your own Linux desktop machines from any MCP-capable LLM client, with opt-in agent capabilities for shell, filesystem, processes, screenshots, system info, and input injection.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables full Linux desktop control including windows, mouse, keyboard, clipboard, audio, screenshots, OCR, accessibility, and system management through MCP-compatible AI agents.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives AI agents local Linux desktop control through tools for screenshots, accessibility, mouse, keyboard, and reliable text input.
      14
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Exposes Anthropic's computer-use action surface (screenshot, click, move, keyboard, clipboard, batch) against a persistent desktop display via MCP stdio protocol. Enables AI agents to control a virtual desktop environment through natural language instructions.
      24
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to automate a Linux desktop natively on Wayland, with 68 tools for screen capture, input simulation, browser automation, OCR, accessibility, media, audio, clipboard, notifications, filesystem, system, memory, and network operations through the MCP protocol.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Cross-platform desktop automation MCP server that lets AI agents capture screenshots, run OCR with UI-element classification, control mouse/keyboard, and launch programs on Linux, macOS, and Windows.
      20
      1
      -

    TDQS

    C2.9/5.0

    Scored across 46 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Several tools have muddy boundaries: textile_get_state and textile_get_sensory_state describe nearly the same blackboard snapshot, and file_op is a catch-all overlapping file_list, file_find, file_stat, file_chmod, and inotify. run_command also overlaps with launch_app, polkit_pkexec, and process management, making selection error-prone.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a clear domain_prefix + action pattern: packagekit_*, polkit_*, process_*, file_*, inotify_*, sensors_*, and textile_get_*. The main blemishes are file_op, a noun-style exception, and a handful of unprefixed tools like search_web, launch_app, and run_command, but overall the convention is recognizable.

    Tool Count2/5

    46 tools is far beyond a typical well-scoped MCP server. The set spans files, processes, packages, polkit, inotify, sensors, web fetching, screen capture, tests, and internal Textile state, which feels like several specialized servers crammed into one.

    Completeness3/5

    Coverage is broad but uneven: package management and polkit are quite complete, while file operations lack delete/move/copy tools and process management lacks a dedicated start tool. Some gaps can be papered over with run_command, but the surface has clear dead ends for a supposed system administration toolkit.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues