mcp-statement-of-account
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-statement-of-account
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables users to track unpaid invoices and generate an escalating ladder of payment-reminder letters — first reminder, second reminder, and final notice — anchored to the due date, plus overdue listings, aging buckets, and a daily chase list of what to send today. It records payments and letters sent, rendering each letter as Markdown or printable HTML without ever emailing anything itself.11MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to search and inspect an invoice ledger, generate VAT summaries, run OCR on local documents, and use reusable prompts for chasing overdue invoices and reconciling entries.2-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables accountants and bookkeepers to ask practice-wide questions across every connected client Xero organisation in one read-only view — overdue invoices, payroll shortfalls, client health scores, trending-trouble lists and practice totals such as revenue and average DSO. It also generates ready-to-send Excel month-end packs per client, with every reported figure accompanied by the rule or formula that produced it and no financial data persisted to disk.12MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceLets a user ask what their business is owed, who to chase first, and get a chase email drafted in their own voice, via tools for weekly totals, chase queues, customer history, due-soon invoices and insights. Every tool only reads or returns a draft, so nothing can be sent.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to manage compliant e-invoicing (Factur-X, EN 16931) by creating, issuing, sending, and tracking invoices, quotes, and retainers through natural language via the Model Context Protocol.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceLets an MCP client find overdue Stripe invoices, see who owes what and how late they are, and re-send reminder emails for invoices that are still open. Runs read-only unless writes are explicitly enabled, re-checks invoice state before sending, and logs every call to an audit trail.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: license activation/status, dunning text, per-client aging, whole-book reporting, and statement building/PDF/text outputs. The descriptions explicitly cross-reference differences, such as statement_aging vs statements_report and statement_text vs statement_pdf, so there is no real ambiguity.
Names are consistently snake_case and mostly use the statement_ prefix, but the verb/noun pattern is mixed: license_activate and statement_build are noun+verb, while license_status, statement_pdf, statement_text, and statements_report are noun+noun. The conventions are readable but not uniform enough for a higher score.
Eight tools is well-scoped for this server: two license utilities, one dunning helper, two aging/report tools, and three statement output tools. Each tool earns its place and covers a distinct part of the statement workflow without redundancy.
The core statement workflow is well covered: build, text, PDF, aging, receivables report, dunning, and license state. Minor gaps exist, such as no license deactivation or quota/usage check for the free monthly statement builds, but these are workable and not likely to break common agent flows.