mcp-checklist
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-checklist
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables users to create reusable purchase requisition checklists, run them against individual orders, record step-by-step pass/fail/NA results with attributions, and sign off to freeze a dated, auditable approval record.16MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables spec-driven development acceptance gate with structured receipts, audit logs, and reviewer-ready evidence.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables deliverable conformance and evidence-chain checks by turning requirements into executable specs, validating numbers against a provenance ledger, and auditing PDF/OOXML metadata and archive manifests.20 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP-compatible hosts to record, retrieve, and verify LoopGrid decision evidence through tools for decisions, reviews, actions, outcomes, and verification.627 PyPIApache 2.0

OpenProofofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables agents to turn written acceptance requirements into explicit browser-check plans, inspect web apps for supported locators and assertions, and run deterministic checks that capture evidence reports. Each requirement is linked to observed pass/fail/unverified evidence, with write actions and target origins restricted unless explicitly allowed.MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP clients and a browser-based MCP Apps host to read and update a shared, revision-checked checklist through tools and an embedded ui:// view. State is isolated per session in a Durable Object and expires after a day of inactivity.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 16 tools
Checklist management tools (create, item_add/remove/show/list/delete) and run tools (start/check/show/list/sign_off/status/report/delete) are clearly separated by prefix. Minor potential confusion between run_show and run_report, but their descriptions clarify different purposes (run_show is a detailed view, run_report a printable export).
All tools follow a clear verb_form pattern: license_status/activate, checklist_create/item_add/remove/show/list/delete, run_start/check/show/list/sign_off/status/report/delete. Naming is consistent, predictable, and uses actions that align with the resource lifecycle.
16 tools is well-scoped for a checklist management server covering both template lifecycle and run lifecycle. Each tool has a distinct role, with no redundancy; the count is appropriate for the domain complexity.
The server provides complete coverage: create, read, update (via item_add/remove), delete for checklists; start, check, show, list, sign-off, status change, report, delete for runs. Edge cases like abandoning runs and handling signed-off runs are addressed, leaving no obvious gaps in the workflow.