Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-checklist

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Default-deny action registry, append-only spend ledger, and human sign-off audit trail (MCP tools).
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables UI auditing via browser automation, capturing per-element evidence and generating Markdown, JSON, and DOCX reports.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides construction-supervision tools for small-to-medium building projects, including stage guidance, inspection checklists, progress tracking, next-stage recommendations, and quotation analysis. It enables local, standards-based MCP interaction over stdio without third-party MCP SDKs.
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables local engineering workflow management by consolidating tickets, QA evidence, time tracking, root cause investigation, knowledge, and reporting into a single SQLite database, allowing generation of complete ticket packages for handoffs, dailies, or career evidence.
      23
      4 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 16 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Checklist management tools (create, item_add/remove/show/list/delete) and run tools (start/check/show/list/sign_off/status/report/delete) are clearly separated by prefix. Minor potential confusion between run_show and run_report, but their descriptions clarify different purposes (run_show is a detailed view, run_report a printable export).

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a clear verb_form pattern: license_status/activate, checklist_create/item_add/remove/show/list/delete, run_start/check/show/list/sign_off/status/report/delete. Naming is consistent, predictable, and uses actions that align with the resource lifecycle.

    Tool Count5/5

    16 tools is well-scoped for a checklist management server covering both template lifecycle and run lifecycle. Each tool has a distinct role, with no redundancy; the count is appropriate for the domain complexity.

    Completeness5/5

    The server provides complete coverage: create, read, update (via item_add/remove), delete for checklists; start, check, show, list, sign-off, status change, report, delete for runs. Edge cases like abandoning runs and handling signed-off runs are addressed, leaving no obvious gaps in the workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSyncing