save_document
Save the active InDesign document to a specified file path. Provide the destination to persist changes.
Instructions
Save the active document
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| filePath | Yes | Path where to save the document |
Save the active InDesign document to a specified file path. Provide the destination to persist changes.
Save the active document
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| filePath | Yes | Path where to save the document |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries full burden yet only states 'Save the active document'. It fails to disclose whether it overwrites, requires specific formats, or any side effects like closing the document.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise at 5 words, but lacks any structure or supplementary detail. It is front-loaded but under-specified for a tool with no annotations.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given one required parameter, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is incomplete. It does not explain save behavior, overwrite policies, or expected outcomes.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% (one parameter fully described). The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema's parameter description, so baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Save' and the resource 'the active document', which is specific and distinguishes it from siblings like 'save_document_to_cloud' or export functions.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'save_document_to_cloud' or export tools. The description does not mention any prerequisites or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/theloniuser/indesign-uxp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server