google-research-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to google-research-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceImplements Anthropic's multi-agent research methodology with tools for iterative web search, source quality scoring, citation tracking, and quality-tiered report generation.4 npm2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables Claude Code and Claude Desktop to run multi-agent literature research: searching arXiv and OpenAlex for papers and producing cited literature reviews. Every cited statement is fact-checked against the paper it cites, so references cannot be fabricated.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceTurn any AI agent into an academic researcher that can search, read, cite, and write full literature reviews autonomously.15MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA multi-model research agent platform supporting Claude, Gemini, and OpenAI models with web search capabilities, thinking-enabled features, and citation support for advanced research workflows.6-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA multi-agent research system that decomposes complex queries into targeted sub-questions, searches the web in parallel, scores source credibility, and synthesizes findings into structured markdown reports.11MIT
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceA sophisticated research assistant that orchestrates a 5-step workflow of connected AI agents to provide deep research capabilities including question enhancement, web search, summarization, citation formatting, and result combination.11MIT
TDQS
Scored across 11 tools
Most tools are distinct, but google_search and web_search both provide simple search with subtle differences, and deep_search vs google_research overlap as deep research options. Descriptions help, but an agent might struggle to choose between them.
All names are snake_case, but the pattern mixes noun-first names (google_search, web_search, research_session, deep_search) with verb-first names (fetch_page, add_source, get_citations, run_subagent, evaluate_coverage). This is readable but not fully consistent.
With 11 tools covering search, full-content extraction, multi-agent research, session management, citations, and subagent coordination, the count is well-scoped for the server's purpose and each tool generally has a place.
The tool set covers the entire research workflow: simple search, deep search, news search, URL fetching, session lifecycle, source addition, citation generation, subagent execution, and coverage evaluation. No critical gaps are apparent.