get_notifications

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It only mentions an optional parameter and does not disclose read-only nature, auth requirements, or behavioral traits like pagination or notification types.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Very concise at two sentences with clear parameter listing. Minimal waste, but the first sentence is a fragment ('Account notifications panel') which slightly reduces clarity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (1 optional param, output schema exists), the description covers the basics but lacks explanation of the panel contents or behavior. For a get-tool, more context about what is returned would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds 'Account name' for the parameter, which the schema already shows as a string with a default. Schema description coverage is 0%, so description must compensate. It adds minimal value beyond the schema properties.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The phrase 'Account notifications panel' hints at retrieving notifications, but lacks a clear verb like 'retrieve' or 'get'. It is not tautological but is vague. Sibling tools are similar (get_account_summary, etc.), but 'notifications' is distinct enough.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. The description does not mention any prerequisites, context, or exclusions. With multiple sibling get-tools, this omission reduces usability.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.