Foreman MCP Server
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to Foreman MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceEnables interaction with Foreman infrastructure management platform through MCP tools, prompts, and resources. Supports querying host information, security updates, and accessing Foreman data via natural language.4GPL 3.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server to interact with Foreman (Red Hat Satellite) instances, enabling management of hosts, provisioning, and configuration via natural language.1-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to interact with Redmine projects, issues, time tracking, and members through natural language via the Model Context Protocol.-
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for managing Foreman hosts and infrastructure. Enables listing, searching, and getting detailed information about hosts, organizations, locations, subnets, domains, and more via natural language.29MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to manage virtualization, Active Directory, Windows hosts via WinRM, PostgreSQL databases, and shell/SSH environments through Model Context Protocol tools.MIT
- AlicenseCqualityBmaintenanceEnables coding agents to connect to a Redmine instance through the Model Context Protocol, providing tools to manage issues, projects, users, time entries, wiki pages, and other Redmine resources via the REST API.6928 npm1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes: call_foreman_api_get handles API calls, fetch_foreman_dsl_docs and get_foreman_dsl_docs both fetch DSL documentation but differ slightly in source (direct fetch vs. cache read), get_foreman_api_resource_docs fetches API resource docs, and poll_task handles task polling. There is minor overlap between the two DSL documentation tools, which could cause slight confusion, but descriptions clarify the difference.
The naming is mixed but readable: tools use verb_noun patterns like call_foreman_api_get and fetch_foreman_dsl_docs, but there are inconsistencies such as get_foreman_api_resource_docs (longer noun phrase) and poll_task (shorter, simpler). While not chaotic, the lack of a uniform structure (e.g., varying verb choices and noun lengths) reduces predictability.
With 5 tools, this server is well-scoped for interacting with Foreman, covering key areas like API calls, documentation retrieval, and task management. Each tool appears to earn its place without being overly sparse or bloated, making it manageable for agents to use effectively.
The tool set covers documentation fetching and basic API/task operations, but there are notable gaps for a Foreman server, such as missing CRUD operations for resources (e.g., create, update, delete), limited API actions beyond GET, and no tools for managing hosts or other core Foreman entities. This could lead to agent workarounds or failures in broader workflows.