Skip to main content
Glama
theforeman

Foreman MCP Server

Official
by theforeman

Related Servers

Alternatives to Foreman MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with Foreman infrastructure management platform through MCP tools, prompts, and resources. Supports querying host information, security updates, and accessing Foreman data via natural language.
      4
      GPL 3.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server to interact with Foreman (Red Hat Satellite) instances, enabling management of hosts, provisioning, and configuration via natural language.
      1
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to interact with Redmine projects, issues, time tracking, and members through natural language via the Model Context Protocol.
      -
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to connect to a Redmine instance through the Model Context Protocol, providing tools to manage issues, projects, users, time entries, wiki pages, and other Redmine resources via the REST API.
      69
      28 npm
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes: call_foreman_api_get handles API calls, fetch_foreman_dsl_docs and get_foreman_dsl_docs both fetch DSL documentation but differ slightly in source (direct fetch vs. cache read), get_foreman_api_resource_docs fetches API resource docs, and poll_task handles task polling. There is minor overlap between the two DSL documentation tools, which could cause slight confusion, but descriptions clarify the difference.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The naming is mixed but readable: tools use verb_noun patterns like call_foreman_api_get and fetch_foreman_dsl_docs, but there are inconsistencies such as get_foreman_api_resource_docs (longer noun phrase) and poll_task (shorter, simpler). While not chaotic, the lack of a uniform structure (e.g., varying verb choices and noun lengths) reduces predictability.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 5 tools, this server is well-scoped for interacting with Foreman, covering key areas like API calls, documentation retrieval, and task management. Each tool appears to earn its place without being overly sparse or bloated, making it manageable for agents to use effectively.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool set covers documentation fetching and basic API/task operations, but there are notable gaps for a Foreman server, such as missing CRUD operations for resources (e.g., create, update, delete), limited API actions beyond GET, and no tools for managing hosts or other core Foreman entities. This could lead to agent workarounds or failures in broader workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessResponsive