get_balance
Retrieve the current balance for a specific account using its ID. Get real-time account information for effective management.
Instructions
Баланс по счёту.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| account_id | Yes | ID счёта |
Retrieve the current balance for a specific account using its ID. Get real-time account information for effective management.
Баланс по счёту.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| account_id | Yes | ID счёта |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, so safety is covered. However, the description adds no further behavioral context (e.g., what happens if account_id is invalid, response format).
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely short, but it borders on under-specification rather than conciseness. It adds no value beyond the title and schema.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the lack of output schema, the description should clarify what the tool returns (e.g., numeric balance, currency). It only says 'balance,' which is vague.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% for the single parameter, so the schema itself documents it. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description ('Account balance.') is a tautology of the tool name and provides no differentiation from sibling tools like get_accounts or get_statement. It states the function but adds no specific context.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is given on when to use this tool vs alternatives. Siblings like get_statement or get_accounts are not mentioned, leaving the agent without contextual help for selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/theYahia/sber-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server