create_webhook

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. As a mutation tool, it only says 'create webhook' without mentioning side effects, auth requirements, error conditions, or success handling. This is a significant gap for an operation that creates a resource.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence with no redundant words. It front-loads the action ('Создать') and purpose ('для получения событий'), efficiently conveying the core functionality.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

While the description states the core function, it lacks essential context for a mutation tool: it doesn't explain what the webhook is used for beyond receiving events, what the response contains (no output schema exists), or any operational caveats. For a tool with no annotations and no output schema, this is inadequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Both parameters (url and event) are fully described in the input schema, including format (uri) and enumerated event values. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, so it meets the baseline for high schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the specific verb 'Создать' (create) on the resource 'вебхук JivoSite' (JivoSite webhook) with the purpose 'для получения событий' (for receiving events). This clearly distinguishes it from sibling tools like get_webhooks and delete_webhook.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance is provided about when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description only states the action, not the context or conditions under which it should be chosen over get_webhooks or delete_webhook, nor any prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.