idpay-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to idpay-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityFmaintenanceMCP server for Payme payment system (Uzbekistan). Supports transactions, statements, payment links, and balance queries via JSON-RPC 2.0.810 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Python-based MCP server for managing Paytm payment links and transactions. It enables users to create payment links, list created links, and retrieve transaction details for specific payment links.-
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for VNPay payment gateway (Vietnam). Supports payment URL generation, transaction queries, refunds, tokenized payments, and IPN verification with HMAC-SHA512 signing.810 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Bank of Georgia iPay payment gateway, enabling payment orders, refunds, recurring payments, and pre-authorization via OAuth 2.0 + JWT.816 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA local MCP server that lets AI agents interact with the Adaptis (MEG) payment gateway, enabling payment link creation, transaction queries, refunds, and integration helpers like generating signed forms and verifying callbacks.-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for cryptocurrency payment integration, enabling payment requests, webhook verification, and payment URL building.6MIT
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
Each tool clearly targets a distinct resource: payment links (list/create/get/delete) and payments (create/verify/get), with transactions listed separately. There is no ambiguity as the purpose of each tool is unique.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., list_links, create_payment, verify_payment). The verbs and nouns are predictable and consistently use snake_case.
With 8 tools, the server is well-scoped for a payment processing domain, covering both payments and payment links without unnecessary redundancy. The number is appropriate and neither too sparse nor overwhelming.
The tool set covers the core lifecycle for payments (create, verify, get) and payment links (create, list, get, delete). The only notable missing operation is an update for payment links, but this is a minor gap and does not severely hinder the primary workflows.