Skip to main content
Glama
theYahia

factura-uz-mcp

by theYahia

Related Servers

Alternatives to factura-uz-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for DACH e-invoicing. Create XRechnung (UBL) and ZUGFeRD 2.3 (Factur-X CII) invoices, validate against EN 16931 rules, extract data from XML, and convert between UBL, CII and JSON formats.
      6
      22 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Spanish Electronic Invoicing. Provides tools to generate, validate, and submit invoices across VERI\*FACTU, Facturae/FACe, SII, TicketBAI, and Crea y Crece B2B.
      20
      321 PyPI
      2
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Argentine electronic invoicing (facturación electrónica) MCP Server for ARCA/AFIP. Emit invoices, manage credentials, check delegations, and look up taxpayers. 10 tools.
      12
      378 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for the Invapi E-Invoicing API, enabling conversion, validation, and extraction of invoices in UBL, CII, ZUGFeRD, Excel, and more.
      19 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for electronic invoicing that enables generating, validating, and parsing Factur-X and ZUGFeRD compliant XML invoices. It supports the French 2026 B2B reform and provides integration with Chorus Pro for automated invoice submission and status tracking.
      9
      31 npm
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool maps to a distinct action or resource: invoice lifecycle actions (create, sign, get, list, accept, reject) are mutually exclusive, and company/product lookups are clearly separate. No two tools overlap in purpose.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., create_invoice, list_products). The verbs are clear and uniform, with no mixed conventions or vague phrasing.

    Tool Count5/5

    Eight tools is well-scoped for an e-invoicing server, covering core operations without redundancy. The count feels neither sparse nor overwhelming for the domain.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers the main invoice lifecycle (create, sign, retrieve, list, accept/reject) plus necessary lookups (company, products). A minor gap exists—no update or cancel/void operation for invoices—but core workflows can be completed without it.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessSyncing