update_workflow_actions

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden. It states 'replace the full workflow actions array', implying overwrite behavior, but does not discuss side effects, permissions, or error conditions. The description adds basic behavioral context but lacks depth.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences, no unnecessary words. Every sentence serves a purpose: stating the action and specifying when to use it.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has two required parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is minimal. It explains the core purpose but lacks details on parameter behavior, return values, or edge cases. It does not adequately compensate for the lack of structured information.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, yet the description only mentions 'intends to send the final desired action list' without explaining the parameters 'workflowId' or the structure of 'actions'. The description does not compensate for the missing parameter details.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Explicitly replace the full workflow actions array.' It identifies the specific verb 'replace' and the resource 'workflow actions array'. Among sibling tools like 'update_workflow_general' and 'update_workflow_start_conditions', this tool is uniquely for actions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides explicit when-to-use guidance: 'This should be used only when the caller intends to send the final desired action list.' It does not mention when not to use or provide alternative tools, but the sibling list shows no other action-specific tool, so the guidance is sufficient.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.