mcp-review-pr
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": true
} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| get_pr_diff | Get the diff for a PR from a local git repository. Returns structured file diffs with additions, deletions, and change types. |
| analyze_impact | Analyze the impact of code changes. Classifies changes by layer, detects breaking changes, and assigns a risk level. |
| list_skills | List all available review skills and which ones would activate for the current PR. |
| get_skill_guidelines | Get review guidelines from all skills that are active for the current PR. Returns merged guidelines, rules, and custom repo rules. |
| load_rulesC | Load all applicable rules: skill-specific rules for active skills plus custom repo rules from rules.md. |
| run_quality_checksB | Run deterministic quality checks: skill linters (ESLint, etc.) and test suite. Returns lint issues and test results. |
| generate_reviewB | Generate a complete structured PR review. Runs all analysis tools (diff, impact, skills, quality) and produces a comprehensive ReviewOutput. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: load_rules handles loading rules, run_quality_checks performs deterministic checks, and generate_review produces the final review. No overlap or ambiguity.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case: load_rules, run_quality_checks, generate_review.
Three tools is ideal for a focused PR review server; each tool has a clear role without being too few or too many.
The tool set covers the full workflow: loading rules, running quality checks, and generating a comprehensive review. No obvious gaps for the intended domain.