DOI Citation Verifier
Related Servers
Alternatives to DOI Citation Verifier
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceVerifies citations in reference lists by checking DOIs against public registries to catch AI-hallucinated or mismatched citations.MIT

CiteStamp MCP serverofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceGround citations before your agent emits them by checking references against public scholarly registries and flagging hallucinated or retracted ones.MIT
SciWeave MCP Serverofficial
FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceGround Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, and Windsurf in 300M scientific works — every citation a verifiable DOI.-- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceFabrication-free, DOI-backed citations for AI content and agents, using openAlex public-domain data with resolvable DOIs. Includes an API and planned MCP server for agent-native citation retrieval.-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceChecks whether a citation has been retracted, corrected, or flagged with an expression of concern by querying Crossref — including retractions that Crossref backfills from the Retraction Watch database, which publishers often never record in their own metadata. Lets an AI agent verify a DOI, or every DOI in a reference list, before using it in research or writing.21MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents and LLM tools to verify academic citations against real literature, detect hallucinated references, retrieve authoritative metadata and DOIs, generate BibTeX/APA/IEEE citations, and search over 200M+ scientific publications via MCP tools.312 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: batchVerifyCitations handles multiple citations efficiently, verifyCitation checks individual citations, and findVerifiedPapers searches databases for verified papers. There is no overlap in functionality, making tool selection straightforward for an agent.
The naming follows a consistent verb_noun pattern (batchVerifyCitations, findVerifiedPapers, verifyCitation), with all tools using camelCase. However, verifyCitation lacks a noun suffix like 'Citation' in its verb part, which is a minor deviation from perfect consistency.
With 3 tools, the count is reasonable for a DOI citation verification server, covering core operations (verify single, verify batch, search verified). It might be slightly thin, as additional tools for managing results or databases could enhance completeness, but it's well-scoped for the basic purpose.
The tool set covers key verification tasks: single and batch verification, plus searching for verified papers. Minor gaps exist, such as tools for updating or deleting verification data, but the core workflow of verifying and finding citations is adequately supported without dead ends.