Skip to main content
Glama
teyepe

systembridge-mcp

by teyepe

Related Servers

Alternatives to systembridge-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for design tokens that gives AI agents read access to design systems, enabling token resolution, listing, and component usage lookups via natural language.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that exposes your design system components and tokens to AI agents, preventing duplicate component creation and hardcoded token values.
      5 npm
      9
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives AI assistants structured access to a design system's tokens, components, guidelines, and patterns, enabling them to read, lint, and author design system data.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server that provides AI coding agents with a queryable contract for design system tokens, components, patterns, and anti-patterns.
      6 npm
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that connects AI clients to Figma components, design tokens, and variables from the BrixUI Design System, enabling component browsing, searching, and token retrieval.
      4
      4 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that exposes a design system and UX rulebook as tools, enabling AI to generate UI consistent with your design tokens, components, layout rules, accessibility guidelines, and templates. It also provides a review tool to score UI proposals against the design system.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 37 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: listing dimensions/brands/themes, searching/validating/transforming tokens, auditing various aspects, generating palettes/scales/systems, diffing, and figma integration. Even overlapping areas like audits are differentiated by scope (semantic vs design vs figma usage). No two tools appear to do the same thing.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: list_, search_, validate_, transform_, generate_, audit_, analyze_, etc. All use lowercase snake_case. The naming is predictable and easily understood.

    Tool Count4/5

    37 tools is on the higher side, but the server covers a broad domain: token management, audit, generation, Figma sync, accessibility, documentation, etc. Each tool serves a specific need, and the count is justified by the comprehensiveness. Could be slightly trimmed, but overall reasonable.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers nearly the entire design token lifecycle: creation (generate), reading (list, search, resolve), transformation, validaton, auditing, migration, and scaling. Missing an explicit delete/remove tool, but migration execution can handle removal. Minor gap, but overall very complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues