A
licenseA
qualityB
maintenanceEnables AI agents to check an EVM address on Base for risk (safe, caution, danger) before sending funds, with reasons, paid per call via x402 from the user's own wallet.
6
265 npm
MIT
SENTINEL
Related Servers
Alternatives to SENTINEL
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
AgentRiskofficial
FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenancePre-Trade Security & Risk Analysis Layer for Autonomous DeFi Agents on Base using x402 protocol.-- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceThe safety layer that checks a DeFi transaction or token before your agent (or you) signs — on Base L2.662 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenancePay-per-use AI security and research tools for autonomous agents on Base, enabling honeypot detection, risk assessment, wallet analysis, and yield optimization via the x402 protocol.1-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceSecurity layer for AI agents that evaluates transaction intents and returns verdicts (ALLOW/WARN/DENY) using deterministic rules, on-chain checks, and simulation.9 npmMIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenancePay-per-call tools for AI agents including trust checks, due diligence, market data, and human-verified approvals, settled in USDC on Base via the x402 protocol.16-
TDQS
A4.7/5.0
Scored across 1 tool
Disambiguation5/5
Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusion. The tool's purpose is clearly defined.
Naming Consistency5/5
The single tool name 'sentinel_guard' is descriptive and follows a clear pattern. Consistency is trivially maintained with one tool.
Tool Count4/5
While only one tool, it fully covers the server's focused purpose of transaction security evaluation. The count is on the lower end but appropriate for a single-purpose service.
Completeness5/5
The tool provides a complete solution for its stated goal: evaluating transactions before signing. It includes all necessary inputs and outputs (verdict, score, receipt) with no obvious gaps.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues