killbottleneck-mcp
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to killbottleneck-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceTurns team chat (Slack, Discord, MS Teams, Mattermost) into a living knowledge base - a typed knowledge graph plus auto-generated wiki - exposed to AI agents through a 28-tool MCP server with semantic search, expert finding, and decision tracing.28446Apache 2.0- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnd-to-end agent-managed company brain. Humans and any MCP agent co-author living docs (Markdown + extensions), 40+ visual diagrams (Mermaid, BPMN, D2, PlantUML, ELK, Excalidraw), plans, and a self-learning Knowledge Graph. 163 tools across 16 categories. Auth: OAuth 2.1 or API key. Lean, secure, affordable — from individuals to enterprise.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Claude, ChatGPT, coding agents (cursor, claude code etc), windsurf, etc— generate visual AI automation workflows. Describe a business process, get an interactive flow map you can edit and share.140 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceOpen-source operational brain that fuses an AI system's agents, memory, knowledge and automations into one rooted, privacy-walled graph, served over MCP with stats, search, node dossiers, neighbors and pathfinding. The same snapshot also renders up to a million nodes in a 3D browser view.81MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables agents to create, customize, analyze and export relationship diagrams — theorem dependencies, paper maps, task RACI, org charts, conversation graphs — through 25 MCP tools, with cycle detection, centrality bottleneck reports, dependency closure and Mermaid/DOT/Markdown/JSON interop. Graphs stay local-first in a diff-friendly JSON source of truth and can be refined on a visual canvas.1-
- FlicenseCqualityAmaintenanceSelf-hosted, source-available AI workflow automation platform. Build multi-agent, RAG, and tool-using pipelines on a visual canvas and publish any workflow as an MCP server (stdio/SSE/Streamable HTTP). Also an MCP client via the agent node.21,284-
TDQS
Scored across 15 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action. Map tools (list_maps, get_map, create_map, add_nodes, update_node, delete_node) are clearly separated from rule tools (create_rule, list_rules, update_rule, delete_rule, list_rule_runs) and template tools (list_rule_templates, save_rule_template, delete_rule_template). No two tools appear to do the same thing.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case, with verbs like list, get, create, add, update, delete, save. The nouns are appropriately pluralized for collections and singular for single entities, creating a predictable and readable API surface.
15 tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range. The count is justified by the dual domain of map management and automation rule management, with each tool serving a distinct purpose and no apparent bloat.
The tool surface covers the core lifecycle for maps (create, read, update nodes, delete nodes) and automation rules (create, read, update, delete, runs, templates), plus organization structure. The only notable gaps are lack of map-level update/delete, but these appear to be intentional API limitations rather than oversights.