Skip to main content
Glama
tendfeed-eu

tendfeed-mcp

Official

Related Servers

Alternatives to tendfeed-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables search and analysis of European public procurement tenders, including EU above-threshold (TED) and below-threshold from 11 national sources, with hybrid search and filtering.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables searching for EU public-procurement tenders, analyzing cross-border risk, and understanding tender details through tools for CPV code lookup, EU threshold checks, red-flag scanning, and SME fit scoring.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Search and analyze 14M+ Taiwan government tenders (since 1999, updated daily): full-text search, award records, vendor win-rate and rivalry reports, agency spending patterns with next-tender predictions, and bid price analysis. Free, no API key required.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables users to search recent EU TED and Spanish PLACSP tender notices by keyword, country, and source, and to retrieve individual notices by id. A free tier returns five notices without source links, while an API key from tender.bitscorp.co unlocks every notice and call.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search, count, and validate EU public-procurement notices from the Tenders Electronic Daily database through read-only, keyless queries using keyword, country, CPV, date-range, and expert-syntax filters. It can run locally over stdio or as a token-protected HTTPS connector, returning notice titles, buyers, values, and links.
      4
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Two tools (find_low_competition_lanes and find_winnable_lanes) are explicitly identical, causing ambiguity. The other two are distinct, but the duplication lowers clarity.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Two tools use 'find_*_lanes' pattern, but the others use 'search_tenders' and 'get_verdict'. The pattern is mixed, making it less predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 4 tools, the set is compact yet covers key functions for a tender intelligence service. Not too few or too many.

    Completeness3/5

    Core capabilities are present (finding lanes, searching tenders, retrieving verdicts), but missing features like listing all sectors or user account management create minor gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues