openclaw-skill-vetter-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to openclaw-skill-vetter-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceScans OpenClaw/ClawHub skills for security vulnerabilities before installation. Detects prompt injection, data exfiltration, credential theft and RCE risks. Autonomous AI-to-AI flow with zero human intervention required.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceVets MCP servers, Claude Code skills, or plugins for unsafe behavior like shell execution, secret access, data exfiltration, prompt injection, and remote code before installation, returning a graded verdict with findings.MIT

AgentVerus MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceSecurity scanning for AI agent skills exposed as MCP tools, enabling skill analysis from ClawHub, GitHub, skills.sh, or raw URLs.5 npmMIT- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceStatic security scanner for AI agent skill packages that detects malicious SKILL.md files and bundled scripts before they run.15-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceFree AI agent skill security scanner. Detects prompt injection, credential theft, zero-width character attacks, and ClawHavoc malware indicators. No signup required.48 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceSecurity scanning for AI agent skills, MCP servers, and agent prompts, returning signed trust scores and detailed findings.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: scanning a single skill (full or specific scanners), scanning directory, listing rules, and generating reports/overviews. No two tools overlap in functionality.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., scan_for_exfiltration, list_detection_rules, vet_skill_directory). No mixing of styles.
With 7 tools, the server covers the core workflows of skill vetting—individual scans, directory audits, rule listing, and reporting—without unnecessary bloat or missing essentials.
The tool set provides full coverage for skill vetting: listing available checks, running comprehensive or targeted scans on a single skill, auditing all skills, and obtaining summarized or detailed reports. No obvious gaps.