Skip to main content
Glama
temurkhan13

openclaw-cost-tracker-mcp

by temurkhan13
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to openclaw-cost-tracker-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • ledgermind

      cognis-digital
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Local LLM cost & token forensics proxy with anomaly detection, enabling security teams to scan for cost anomalies and abuse patterns, and expose results via MCP for autonomous agents.
      -

    • Token Analyzer MCP

      cordlesssteve
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Provides intelligent analysis of token usage patterns and optimization recommendations to improve efficiency and reduce costs in Claude Code sessions. Offers real-time analysis, cost metrics, and actionable insights for better context window and tool usage optimization.
      3 npm
      -

    • LLM Usage & Cost Tracker

      zhaoyue722
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A local-first, multi-provider cost meter for LLM usage, exposed as MCP tools. Captures every call into a local SQLite ledger and lets any coding agent query spend, compare providers, and get recommendations — no cloud, no account. First-class support for Chinese providers (Qwen, DeepSeek) alongside Anthropic and OpenAI.
      7
      23 PyPI
      4
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct cost analysis aspect: overview, agent/provider breakdown, anomalies, forecasting, recommendations, and top drivers. No overlap in functionality.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names use consistent lowercase underscore pattern, clearly indicating their purpose (e.g., cost_overview, find_cost_anomalies). Pattern is predictable and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Seven tools is ideal for a focused cost tracker; each tool covers a specific need without redundancy or bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    Covers core cost analysis needs (overview, breakdowns, anomalies, forecasting, optimization). Minor gaps like filtering or export are acceptable given the scope.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessSyncing

    Resources