scan_thresholds
Scan a specified path to detect threshold violations, with optional recursive search.
Instructions
Scan a path for threshold violations
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | Yes | Path to scan | |
| recursive | No |
Scan a specified path to detect threshold violations, with optional recursive search.
Scan a path for threshold violations
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | Yes | Path to scan | |
| recursive | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and the description fails to disclose whether the scan is read-only, mutates state, or requires special permissions. The term 'violations' is vague.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single underspecified sentence. While brief, it lacks necessary details, making it more under-specified than concise.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema, no annotations, and minimal description. An agent has no idea what the tool returns, side effects, or how to interpret results.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 50% (only 'path' described). The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, and the 'recursive' parameter is not explained.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Scan a path for threshold violations' clearly states the action and resource, distinguishing it from similar siblings like 'guardian_scan' by specifying thresholds.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus siblings or any prerequisites. The description lacks context for appropriate invocation.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/templetwo/sovereign-stack'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server