Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to VulneraMCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      AI-powered cybersecurity automation platform with 150+ security tools and 12+ autonomous AI agents for penetration testing, vulnerability assessment, and bug bounty hunting. Enables comprehensive security testing through intelligent tool selection and automated workflows.
      2
      -
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to generate and manage specialized bug bounty hunting workflows including reconnaissance, vulnerability testing, OSINT gathering, and file upload testing. Provides REST API endpoints for comprehensive security assessments with intelligence-driven vulnerability prioritization.
      40
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables comprehensive security testing and penetration testing through natural language conversations with 92+ tools for reconnaissance, vulnerability assessment, web application testing, OSINT, and reporting. Designed for authorized bug bounty hunting and security assessments.
      43
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables automated bug bounty hunting and security research with tools for reconnaissance, web vulnerability scanning, API testing, binary analysis, and mobile app analysis through an MCP interface.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An automated penetration testing framework that enables intelligent security assessments through reconnaissance, vulnerability scanning, and controlled exploitation. Features AI-driven workflow management with comprehensive reporting for authorized security testing.
      27
      4 npm
      7
      BSD 3-Clause

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 47 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools are well-organized into clear functional categories (db, js, recon, render, security, training, zap), which helps disambiguation significantly. However, within categories like 'training' there are multiple import tools (import, import_all, import_htb, import_portswigger) that could cause confusion about which to use for specific scenarios. The overall structure prevents major misselection issues.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Excellent naming consistency throughout. All tools follow a consistent 'category.action' pattern (e.g., 'db.get_findings', 'js.analyze', 'security.test_xss'). The verb_noun structure is maintained within each category, and there's no mixing of naming conventions. This predictability makes the tool set easy to navigate.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 47 tools, this server feels overloaded for a single MCP server. While the domain (vulnerability assessment) is broad, the tool count creates cognitive overhead and suggests the server might be trying to do too much. A more focused approach with 15-25 tools would likely be more appropriate for agent usability.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface provides comprehensive coverage of the vulnerability assessment domain. It includes database operations, JavaScript analysis, reconnaissance, rendering, security testing, training data management, and ZAP integration. The tools support complete workflows from reconnaissance through testing to result analysis, with no obvious gaps in the core functionality.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues