Skip to main content
Glama
tejpalvirk

Quantitative Researcher MCP Server

by tejpalvirk

buildcontext

Construct and expand quantitative research knowledge graphs by adding entities, relations, and observations. Organize datasets, variables, hypotheses, tests, and results, and establish connections to document methodologies and findings systematically.

Instructions

A versatile tool for constructing and enhancing the quantitative research knowledge graph by adding new research elements, relationships, and observations.

When to use this tool:

  • Creating new research entities (projects, datasets, variables, hypotheses, statistical tests, etc.)

  • Establishing relationships between research elements (e.g., connecting variables to datasets, statistical tests to hypotheses)

  • Adding observations, properties, or metadata to existing research entities

  • Building the research corpus incrementally as data collection and analysis progress

  • Organizing and structuring quantitative data within your research framework

  • Documenting statistical analyses, models, and their results

  • Tracking research questions and linking them to findings

  • Creating visualizations and connecting them to data and analyses

  • Setting status values for research activities and entities

  • Assigning priorities to research tasks and activities

  • Defining sequential relationships between research processes

Key features:

  • Creates three distinct types of knowledge graph elements: entities, relations, and observations

  • Supports specialized quantitative research entity types (projects, datasets, variables, hypotheses, statistical tests, etc.)

  • Validates entity and relation types against predefined standards for the quantitative research domain

  • Handles batch creation of multiple entities or relations in a single operation

  • Returns confirmation with details of created elements

  • Ensures proper data typing and structure for the quantitative research knowledge graph

  • Enables comprehensive documentation of statistical analysis processes

  • Supports status and priority assignment through entity-relation model

  • Enables sequential relationships through precedes relation

Parameters explained:

  1. type: The type of creation operation to perform

  • Accepts: "entities", "relations", or "observations"

  • Determines how the data parameter is interpreted

  1. data: The content to add to the knowledge graph (structure varies by type):

  • For "entities": An array of objects, each containing:

    • name: Unique identifier for the entity

    • entityType: One of the valid entity types (project, dataset, variable, hypothesis, statisticalTest, result, analysisScript, visualization, model, literature, researchQuestion, finding, participant, status, priority)

    • observations: Array of strings containing notes or properties about the entity

  • For "relations": An array of objects, each containing:

    • from: Name of the source entity

    • to: Name of the target entity

    • relationType: The type of relationship between entities (e.g., correlates_with, predicts, tests, analyzes, produces, has_status, has_priority, precedes)

  • For "observations": Either a single object or an array of objects, each containing:

    • entityName: Name of the entity to add observations to

    • contents: Array of strings with new observations to add

Valid entity types:

  • project: Overall research study

  • dataset: Collection of data used for analysis

  • variable: Specific measurable attribute in a dataset

  • hypothesis: Formal testable statement

  • statisticalTest: Analysis method applied to data

  • result: Outcome of statistical analysis

  • analysisScript: Code used to perform analysis

  • visualization: Visual representation of data

  • model: Statistical/mathematical model

  • literature: Academic sources

  • researchQuestion: Formal questions guiding the study

  • finding: Results or conclusions

  • participant: Research subjects

  • status: Entity status values

  • priority: Entity priority values

Valid relation types:

  • correlates_with: Statistical correlation between variables

  • predicts: Predictive relationship from independent to dependent variable

  • tests: Statistical test examines hypothesis

  • analyzes: Analysis performed on dataset

  • produces: Analysis produces result

  • visualizes: Visualization displays data or result

  • contains: Hierarchical relationship

  • part_of: Entity is part of another entity

  • depends_on: Dependency relationship

  • supports: Evidence supporting a hypothesis or finding

  • contradicts: Evidence contradicting a hypothesis or finding

  • derived_from: Entity is derived from another entity

  • controls_for: Variable/method controls for confounds

  • moderates: Variable moderates a relationship

  • mediates: Variable mediates a relationship

  • implements: Script implements statistical test/model

  • compares: Statistical comparison between groups/variables

  • includes: Model includes variables

  • validates: Validates a model or result

  • cites: References literature

  • has_status: Links entity to its status

  • has_priority: Links entity to its priority

  • precedes: Entity comes before another entity in sequence

Status information:

  • Valid status values include: active, completed, pending, abandoned

  • Status is assigned through the has_status relation type

  • Status helps track progress of research activities

Priority information:

  • Valid priority values: high, low

  • Priority is assigned through the has_priority relation type

  • Priority helps identify critical research tasks

Sequential Process Information:

  • The precedes relation establishes logical ordering between research processes

  • Sequential relationships document the flow of the research methodology

  • Helps maintain proper order in multi-step analysis procedures

Return information:

  • JSON response indicating success or failure

  • For successful operations:

    • Success flag set to true

    • Details of created elements in the "created" field (for entities/relations) or "added" field (for observations)

  • For failed operations:

    • Success flag set to false

    • Error message describing the issue

Error handling:

  • Validates entity types against the predefined list for quantitative research

  • Validates relation types against acceptable standards

  • Returns descriptive error messages for invalid inputs

  • Gracefully handles type mismatches and formatting errors

You should:

  • Use consistent naming conventions for entities to facilitate relationships and retrieval

  • Begin by creating projects and datasets before more specific research elements

  • Add detailed observations to entities to enhance context and retrievability

  • Create relationships to build a comprehensive network of interconnected research data

  • Document statistical methodology thoroughly by connecting tests, variables, and hypotheses

  • Add statistical results with appropriate metadata (p-values, effect sizes, confidence intervals)

  • Create visualizations and link them to the data they represent

  • Use relations to document the flow of analysis from data to findings

  • Connect literature to support hypotheses and contextualize findings

  • Structure models with clear relationships to the variables they include

  • Document analysis scripts with information about their purpose and implementation

  • Use has_status relations to track the progress of research activities (active, completed, pending, abandoned)

  • Use has_priority relations to indicate important research elements (high, low)

  • Use precedes relations to establish sequences in research methodologies

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYesData for the creation operation, structure varies by type but must be an array
typeYesType of creation operation: 'entities', 'relations', or 'observations'
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It thoroughly describes key behavioral traits: validation of entity/relation types against predefined standards, batch creation support, return format details (success/failure with created/added fields), error handling with descriptive messages, and specific behavioral aspects like status/priority assignment and sequential relationships. This goes well beyond the basic input schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is comprehensive but overly verbose (over 800 words). While well-structured with clear sections (purpose, usage, features, parameters, valid types, return info, guidelines), it includes redundant information (e.g., listing entity/relation types could be more concise) and could be more front-loaded. Some sentences don't earn their place in a tool description context, making it less efficient than ideal.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (knowledge graph construction with multiple operation types), no annotations, and no output schema, the description provides exceptional completeness. It covers purpose, usage scenarios, behavioral details, parameter semantics, valid values, return formats, error handling, and extensive implementation guidelines. This fully compensates for the lack of structured metadata and provides everything needed for effective tool use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Despite 100% schema description coverage, the description adds substantial semantic value through a dedicated 'Parameters explained' section. It explains how the 'type' parameter determines interpretation of 'data', provides detailed structural examples for each type (entities, relations, observations), lists all valid entity types (16 types) and relation types (25 types), and clarifies status/priority values. This transforms the schema's basic definitions into practical, domain-specific guidance.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose as 'constructing and enhancing the quantitative research knowledge graph by adding new research elements, relationships, and observations.' It specifies the exact operations (creating entities, relations, observations) and distinguishes this from sibling tools like 'deletecontext' and 'loadcontext' by focusing on creation rather than deletion or loading.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description includes an explicit 'When to use this tool' section with 12 specific scenarios (e.g., 'Creating new research entities,' 'Establishing relationships between research elements'), and a detailed 'You should' section with 15 actionable guidelines (e.g., 'Begin by creating projects and datasets before more specific research elements,' 'Use consistent naming conventions'). This provides comprehensive guidance on when and how to use the tool effectively.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Related Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/tejpalvirk/quantitativeresearch'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server