Skip to main content
Glama
techsaurabh-394

mcp-notes-server

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-notes-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables Claude Desktop to manage a notes file through MCP tools for adding, retrieving, updating, deleting, and listing notes. Supports configurable note storage paths and atomic saves for safer writes.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to read, search, create, update, and remove locally stored personal notes organized by themes and subt themes, with backlink navigation, all through MCP tools.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables managing plain-text notes on disk through MCP resources, tools, and prompts, so natural-language requests can create, read, search, delete, and summarize notes via an interactive client.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage in-memory notes by listing, fetching, and creating notes through MCP tools over stdio.
      91 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool maps to a clearly distinct operation: create, enumerate, keyword-search, and delete. There is no overlap between search_notes and list_notes since one is keyword-based and the other is enumerative with tag filtering, and descriptions make the boundaries explicit.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools follow a verb_noun snake_case pattern (add_note, list_notes, search_notes, delete_note), which is highly predictable. The only minor deviation is singular 'note' in add/delete versus plural 'notes' in list/search, but this reflects natural object plurality rather than a convention break.

    Tool Count4/5

    Four tools is a tight, well-scoped surface for a simple notes server, with each tool earning its place. It sits at the low end of the typical 3-15 range, and the absence of any modification tool makes it feel slightly under-provisioned rather than bloated.

    Completeness3/5

    The surface covers create, read/list, search, and delete, but there is no update/edit tool, so an agent cannot modify an existing note's title, body, or tags without deleting and recreating it. Retrieval by id is also only implicitly available via search, leaving a notable lifecycle gap.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues