Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to xknow-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-capable coding agents to query a self-hosted, LLM-compiled Markdown knowledge base through a single ask tool that answers from whole wiki articles and returns citations back to the source pages. Supports both local stdio and remote streamable-HTTP transports, with no embeddings or vector store involved.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform local-first web search, fetch, crawl, extract, cache, research, and autonomous information gathering through MCP, with no API keys or cloud dependencies.
      3,236 npm
      AGPL 3.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible AI agents to search, ask, and retrieve section-level cited answers from a local hybrid index over scattered notes, documents, and chat logs.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and MCP-compatible hosts to search, ask, and retrieve section-level citations from scattered local notes, docs, PDFs, Word files, web pages, org files, and chat logs using hybrid vector and BM25 retrieval.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation: search, read, explore graph, list, and cite. No overlap in purpose or output, making selection straightforward.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Mostly consistent verb_noun patterns (search_knowledge, get_page, explore_concept, list_topics), but 'cite' deviates as a bare verb without an object. Minor inconsistency.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools perfectly cover the core workflows of a knowledge retrieval server: discover, search, read, explore connections, and cite. Well-scoped with no extraneous tools.

    Completeness4/5

    Covers all essential operations for a read-only knowledge base. Missing tools for editing or adding notes, but the server appears curated and source-backed, so writes may be intentionally out of scope.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues