A
licenseNot graded
qualityB
maintenanceAn MCP server that delegates tasks to Google Gemini, enabling live web search, video/audio understanding, and summarizing large files.
MIT
MCP Gemini API Server
by techkwon
Related Servers
Alternatives to MCP Gemini API Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for Google's Gemini API, enabling text, image, video, speech, embeddings, and deep research capabilities through a single tool set.10MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides access to Google Gemini models via Vertex AI, enabling text generation, multi-turn chat, image/video generation, and frontend design through Claude Code.21MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for generating images and audio using Google's Gemini AI models.22MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for Google Gemini that enables image generation, editing, file analysis, and chat using browser cookies, no API key needed.655AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server for AI-powered image generation, editing, analysis, and transformation using Google's Gemini and Imagen 4 models.192AGPL 3.0
TDQS
B3/5.0
Scored across 6 tools
Disambiguation3/5
The tools have some clear distinctions but also notable overlap. analyze_directory and analyze_files both perform analysis with a prompt, differing only in input scope (directory vs. multiple files), which could cause confusion. raw_prompt is similar but lacks file context. The config tools and verify_feature are distinct, but the analysis tools blur together.
Naming Consistency4/5
Tool names follow a consistent snake_case pattern with clear verb_noun structures (e.g., analyze_directory, get_config). All tools adhere to this convention, making them readable and predictable. Minor deviation in raw_prompt (which uses 'raw' as an adjective) is acceptable.
Tool Count5/5
With 6 tools, the count is well-scoped for a Gemini API server. It covers core analysis operations, configuration management, and a verification feature without being overwhelming. Each tool appears to serve a specific purpose, fitting a typical utility server scope.
Completeness3/5
The toolset covers basic analysis and configuration but has gaps. It lacks operations for managing analysis results (e.g., list or delete analyses) and doesn't support advanced Gemini features like model selection or streaming. The verify_feature tool is useful but doesn't fully round out the domain, leaving some workflows incomplete.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues