Delete a cached user by integer ID to remove obsolete user records from the DEX tenant and keep user management accurate.
Delete a cached user by their integer ID.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Integer ID |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.0.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the full behavioral disclosure burden, but it only states that a user is deleted. It does not say whether deletion is permanent, affects only the cache, requires the ID to exist, or cascades to related cached memberships.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single, front-loaded sentence with no filler. Every word contributes to the core purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The tool is simple, one parameter, and the description covers the essential operation, but with no annotations it leaves behavioral details such as permanence and cache-only scope unstated. Adequate but with gaps.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% for the single `id` parameter, so the schema already documents it. The description's 'integer ID' adds no meaning beyond what the schema provides, so baseline 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
States a specific action ('Delete'), a resource ('cached user'), and the identifier type ('integer ID'). This clearly distinguishes it from sibling operations like cached_users_list, cached_users_get_by_id, and cached_users_update.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives or any conditions/prerequisites. The use case is only implied by the verb and resource; there are no exclusions or comparisons to related deletion tools.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.