get_address_overview

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description bears full burden. Only states returns string format and accepted address formats. Does not disclose any behavioral traits like read-only nature, error conditions, or idempotency. For a read operation, minimal but insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise: one sentence for purpose, bullet list of outputs, one line for accepted formats, one line for use case. No wasted words; all content is relevant and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Output schema exists, so return values are covered externally. Description adds context on address format and use cases. Lacks error handling or edge cases, but for simple tool with output schema, generally complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so description must add value. It specifies accepted address formats (base58 or hash160), which is helpful but minimal. No examples, length constraints, or validation details. Adds some meaning but not substantial.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the tool provides a simplified overview of a Bitcoin address with balance and cumulative totals. Lists specific metrics returned. Slightly differentiated from sibling 'get_info_about_address' by emphasizing 'simplified' vs 'granular details', but no explicit comparison.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says 'when you need a quick financial summary without granular details', which provides appropriate context for use. However, no explicit when-not or alternative tools are mentioned; guidance is implicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.