Skip to main content
Glama
tbrito88
by tbrito88

Related Servers

Alternatives to Fusion360 Live MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Connects AI coding agents to Autodesk Fusion 360 for CAD/CAM automation, exposing 84 tools for sketching, modeling, assembly, inspection, export, and G-code post-processing through any MCP-compatible client.
      85
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to generate Autodesk Fusion 360 Python scripts through natural language commands, using the Model Context Protocol (MCP) for tool calls and script generation.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible assistants to control Autodesk Fusion for mechanical modeling, assembly editing, CAM workflows, inspection, and model export through Fusion's native MCP endpoint.
      39
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Connects AI coding agents to Autodesk Fusion 360 for CAD automation, enabling natural language control over sketching, 3D modeling, and CAM operations. It uses a Python-based bridge and a custom add-in to execute over 80 tools ranging from simple geometry creation to complex assembly and parameter management.
      80
      329 PyPI
      108
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to inspect and automate Autodesk Fusion 360 through MCP, providing tools for CAD modeling, CAM manufacturing, and document management.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Open-source MCP server for controlling Autodesk Fusion 360 from any AI agent, enabling 3D modeling operations via natural language.
      3
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 92 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    The set covers many distinct CAD operations, but there is significant overlap: multiple export tools (export, export_stl, export_step, export_f3d), two box creation tools (create_box, create_box_parametric), multiple joint tools (add_joint, create_as_built_joint, create_rigid_group), and both render_view and export_view_sheet produce images. Descriptions help resolve most cases, but an agent must read carefully to avoid misselection.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Names are consistently snake_case and mostly follow a verb_noun pattern (split_body, create_sketch, get_parameters). A few single-verb names (extrude, mirror, loft) are conventional CAD terms and do not break the pattern; minor deviations like 'export' vs 'export_stl' and 'boolean_operation' are acceptable.

    Tool Count1/5

    92 tools is far beyond the 3–15 typical range and exceeds even the 25+ 'too many' threshold. While the domain is broad, many operations could be consolidated (e.g., export variants, primitive creation, sketch drawing tools), indicating an over-exposed surface that increases cognitive load.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers modeling, sketching, constraints, assemblies, measurement, export/import, sheet metal, CAM, and rendering—nearly all of Fusion 360's major workflows. Minor gaps exist (e.g., importing STEP/IGES, creating engineering drawings), but execute_code provides an escape hatch for missing operations.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues