No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 20 tools
Each tool targets a distinct data type or aggregation level (authorizations, settlements, declines, balances, counts, etc.) with clear descriptions. Even related tools like get_chargebacks_detail and get_chargebacks_status serve clearly different purposes (detail vs status). No overlapping ambiguity.
Most tools follow a 'get_' prefix with a noun describing the data (e.g., get_authorizations). Two exceptions: export_view_to_file and list_available_views use different verbs, but these are distinct actions (export vs list) and still clear. Overall pattern is consistent and readable.
20 tools is well-scoped for a financial reporting API. Each tool corresponds to a specific endpoint or metric, and the count covers the full range of DiVA views without unnecessary duplication. It's not too heavy nor too thin.
The tool set covers the major reporting areas: authorizations, settlements, declines, chargebacks, balances, cards, users, counts, and export. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no refunds or dispute tools), but for a typical reporting use case, the coverage is thorough and no critical dead ends are apparent.