A
licenseB
qualityD
maintenanceMCP server for Synthesizer V AI Vocal Studio, which allows LLMs to create/edit vocal tracks e.g. adding lyrics to the melody.
6
12
Apache 2.0
svs-mcp
by tatat
Related Servers
Alternatives to svs-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that enables AI to compose melodies and generate VOCALOID6 project files (.vpr/.vsqx), with tools for MIDI conversion, lyric correction, and opening projects in the VOCALOID6 editor.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA local MCP server that enables AI agents to control Synthesizer V Studio 1.x via its Lua scripting API.3-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that turns PreSonus Studio One into an AI-controllable DAW, enabling production workflows like editing, MIDI manipulation, mixing, effects, and export through an LLM.5MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables local AI-assisted tuning of Synthesizer V Studio 2 Pro projects via natural language, providing tools for reading selections, previewing and applying parameter adjustments, recording and comparing audio, and managing sessions.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables local AI models to automatically generate lyrics and style prompts, then submit songs to Suno via browser automation.MIT
TDQS
A4.1/5.0
Scored across 16 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, with only minor overlap between update_notes and set_lyrics for lyric changes. The two lyrics-editor tools are a complementary pair, and note CRUD is cleanly separated into insert/update/delete.
Naming Consistency4/5
Tool names are mostly verb_noun in snake_case, but 'ping' stands alone and the set mixes 'add', 'create', and 'insert' for similar actions. Still predictable and readable overall.
Tool Count4/5
At 16 tools, this is slightly above the typical well-scoped range, but the complexity of controlling Synthesizer V justifies the number. Each tool serves a distinct purpose and there is no evident redundancy.
Completeness3/5
The tool set provides solid coverage for notes (CRUD), lyrics, phonemes, and phrase analysis, but lacks delete operations for tracks and groups, and offers no API to set the singer. These are notable gaps in lifecycle management that could force UI workarounds.
Maintenance
ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessNo issues