Skip to main content
Glama
tanmay4l

Futarchy MCP Server

by tanmay4l

Related Servers

Alternatives to Futarchy MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive Model Context Protocol server that transforms Cursor's AI assistant into a DeSo blockchain development expert, providing complete API coverage, debugging solutions, and code generation for DeSo applications.
      8
      4
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables AI models to interact with the Solana blockchain, providing RPC methods, wallet management, DeFi trading capabilities, and Helius API integration for enhanced Solana development.
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Solana blockchain interaction server that allows AI tools to query blockchain data using natural language, access structured token information, and generate human-readable explanations of complex blockchain concepts.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A server that allows AI agents to interact with the Tally API to access DAO governance data, proposals, and metadata using Model Context Protocol (MCP), built with TypeScript and GraphQL.
      10 npm
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server enabling AI agents to interact with the Solana blockchain for DeFi operations like checking balances, transferring tokens, executing swaps, and fetching price data.
      15 npm
      22
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no ambiguity. Tools are clearly separated into DAO operations (getDao, getDaos), proposal operations (createProposal, getProposal, getProposals), market operations (buy/sell in pass/fail markets), and sentiment analysis (getProposalSentiment). The descriptions make it immediately clear which tool to use for each specific action.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern throughout. The naming convention is perfectly uniform with clear action prefixes (buyIn, sellIn, create, get) followed by specific objects (FailMarket, PassMarket, Proposal, Dao, ProposalSentiment). There are no deviations in style or convention across the entire toolset.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 10 tools, this is well-scoped for a Futarchy system. Each tool earns its place by covering distinct aspects of the domain: DAO management, proposal lifecycle, market trading operations, and sentiment analysis. The count is appropriate for the apparent scope without being overwhelming or insufficient.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface provides complete CRUD/lifecycle coverage for the Futarchy domain. It covers DAO discovery (getDaos, getDao), proposal creation and retrieval (createProposal, getProposal, getProposals), market operations for both pass and fail outcomes (buy/sell), and even sentiment analysis. There are no obvious gaps or dead ends for agents working with this system.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues