Skip to main content
Glama
enesjakozh
tanker327

UUID MCP Provider

by tanker327
OverviewSchemaRelated ServersScoreDiscussions
TypeScript
Hybrid

UUID MCP 공급자

LLM에서 호출될 때마다 타임스탬프 기반 UUID를 제공하는 간단한 MCP(모델 컨텍스트 프로토콜) 서버입니다.

특징

  • 단일 도구 제공: generateUuid

  • 타임스탬프 기반 고유 식별자에 UUID v7을 사용합니다.

  • 입력 매개변수가 필요 없는 간단한 인터페이스

  • Claude 및 기타 LLM과의 쉬운 통합

Related MCP server: MCP UUID Server

설치

지엑스피1

용법

서버를 직접 실행할 수 있습니다:

npm start

Claude Desktop과 통합

Claude Desktop과 통합하려면 Claude Desktop 구성 파일에 다음을 추가하세요.

  • macOS: ~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json

  • Windows: %APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "uuid-provider": {
      "command": "node",
      "args": ["/absolute/path/to/uuid-mcp/build/index.js"]
    }
  }
}

/absolute/path/to/uuid-mcp/build/index.js 빌드한 index.js 파일의 절대 경로로 바꿉니다.

구성을 업데이트한 후 Claude Desktop을 다시 시작하여 사용 가능한 UUID 생성 도구를 확인하세요.

작동 원리

이 서버는 공식 uuid 패키지를 사용하여 UUID v7 식별자를 생성합니다. UUID v7은 강력한 고유성 보장을 유지하면서 타임스탬프 기반으로 특별히 설계되었습니다.

  • 밀리초 단위의 Unix 타임스탬프를 통합합니다.

  • 동일한 밀리초 내에 여러 ID가 생성되는 경우에도 고유성을 보장하기 위해 무작위 데이터를 추가합니다.

  • UUID 생성을 위한 최신 RFC 표준을 따릅니다.

  • 시간순으로 정렬 가능한 식별자를 제공합니다.

  • 분산 시스템에서 충돌을 방지합니다

이 접근 방식은 사용자 지정 UUID 구현보다 더 안정적이며 높은 부하에서도 중복 가능성을 제거합니다.

종속성

  • @modelcontextprotocol/sdk : MCP 서버 구현용

  • uuid : RFC 호환 UUID 생성용

  • 개발을 위한 TypeScript 및 관련 도구

예

호출 시 도구는 다음과 같은 UUID v7 문자열을 반환합니다.

018e94d2-279b-7bd3-9289-80d1e6619670

UUID의 첫 번째 부분에는 타임스탬프가 포함되어 있어 표준 UUID 형식을 유지하면서 식별자를 시간순으로 정렬할 수 있습니다.

Available Tools

1 tool
generateUuidA

Generate a UUID v7 that's timestamp-based and guaranteed to be unique

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No parameters

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden. It discloses that the tool generates a UUID v7 (implying a read-only operation that produces output) and specifies it's 'timestamp-based' and 'guaranteed to be unique', which adds useful behavioral context. However, it doesn't mention potential side effects, error conditions, or performance characteristics, leaving some gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence that directly states the tool's function and key attributes ('timestamp-based', 'guaranteed to be unique'). It is front-loaded with the core purpose and avoids any unnecessary words, making it highly concise and well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (0 parameters, no output schema, no annotations), the description is nearly complete for its context. It clearly explains what the tool does and key behavioral traits. A minor deduction is made because it doesn't specify the output format or any usage constraints, but overall it's sufficient for a basic generation tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0 parameters with 100% coverage, so no parameter documentation is needed. The description appropriately focuses on the tool's purpose without redundant parameter details, earning a baseline score of 4 for effectively handling a parameterless tool.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the specific action ('Generate') and resource ('UUID v7'), with additional specificity about it being 'timestamp-based' and 'guaranteed to be unique'. It fully distinguishes what the tool does without any sibling tools to differentiate from.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage context through 'timestamp-based' and 'guaranteed to be unique', suggesting it's suitable for scenarios requiring time-ordered unique identifiers. However, it lacks explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, and there are no sibling tools mentioned to provide comparative context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools. The single tool has a clear, distinct purpose that cannot be confused with any other tool in the set.

Naming Consistency5/5

A single tool inherently has perfect naming consistency, as there are no other tools to compare it against. The tool name 'generateUuid' follows a clear verb_noun pattern and stands alone without any conflicting conventions.

Tool Count2/5

A single tool is too few for most practical server purposes, making the set feel thin and limited. While generating UUIDs is a straightforward task, a server with only one tool lacks the breadth typically expected for agent workflows, even for a simple domain like UUID generation.

Completeness3/5

For the narrow domain of UUID generation, the tool provides the core functionality (generate a UUID v7). However, there are notable gaps, such as no tools for generating other UUID versions (e.g., v4), validating UUIDs, or parsing UUIDs, which limits agent flexibility in handling UUID-related tasks.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues

Resources

Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.

Looking for Admin?

If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • MCP UUID Server

    aki-kii
    F
    license
    D
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A simple service that generates random UUIDs when requested through Claude Desktop.
    1

  • UUID MCP Provider

    prazedotid
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A simple Model Context Protocol server that provides timestamp-based UUID v7 identifiers when called by an LLM, offering chronologically sortable unique IDs with no input parameters needed.
    1
    229
    MIT

  • UUIDv7 Generator

    pomazanbohdan
    F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Generates UUIDv7 strings either individually or in batches, providing time-sortable universally unique identifiers through the Model Context Protocol.

Appeared in Searches

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/tanker327/uuid-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server