Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Arai

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Local guardrail proxy for AI coding agents. Wraps any MCP server (stdio or HTTP/SSE) and blocks destructive tool calls before they execute, with TOFU catalog pinning against rug pulls and tool-poisoning/result-injection scanning. Single Rust binary, Apache-2.0.
      14
      11
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      AI Constraint Engine that enforces CLAUDE.md, .cursorrules, and AGENTS.md rules as laws. 51 MCP tools for semantic conflict detection, patch review, drift scoring, pre-commit hooks, and Guardian Mode. Catches euphemisms, temporal evasion, and hidden violations that keyword matching misses.
      177 npm
      25
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Policy-based governance for AI agent tool calls. YAML policies, approval gates, risk assessment, and audit logging across LangChain, OpenAI, Anthropic, and MCP.
      5
      15
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Centralizes AI behavior rules and applies them across tools like Codex, Claude Code, and Cursor, enabling agents to fetch up-to-date rules before responding.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Real security scanners for AI coding agents — SAST (441 rules), secret detection (419+ patterns), dependency CVEs (OSV.dev), MCP/skill vetting, MITRE ATT&CK. Open-source, Rust, free
      7 npm
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A4.5/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a unique and clear purpose: adding guardrails, probing actions, listing guards, and reviewing decisions. No overlap exists.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow the consistent 'arai_verb_noun' pattern, using snake_case throughout. Names are descriptive and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 4 tools, the set is appropriately scoped for a guardrail management server—neither too few nor too many.

    Completeness4/5

    The tools cover the core lifecycle (add, check, list, review) but lack a removal or update mechanism for guardrails, which is a minor gap.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSlow