Skip to main content
Glama
tanishra

ExpenseTracker MCP Server

by tanishra

Related Servers

Alternatives to ExpenseTracker MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage personal expenses by adding, querying, and summarizing expense data through a SQLite database and configurable categories.
      1
      GPL 3.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage personal expenses through natural conversation, supporting expense tracking, categorization, filtering, and financial summaries. Uses SQLite database to store expense records with full CRUD operations for comprehensive personal finance management.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to record and retrieve expenses through natural language, with support for categories, dates, and descriptions, backed by a Postgres database.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to track and manage expenses, including adding, viewing, and summarizing expenses by category, date, or amount, with persistent local storage.
      2
      -

    TDQS

    C2.1/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes targeting specific expense tracking operations like adding, listing, deleting, updating, and reporting. However, 'summarize' and 'monthly_report' could potentially overlap in function if not clearly differentiated by their descriptions, creating minor ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent snake_case pattern with clear verb_noun structures (e.g., add_expense, list_expenses, monthly_report). There are no deviations in naming conventions, making the set predictable and easy to parse.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 12 tools, this server is well-scoped for an expense tracking domain. The count is appropriate, covering core operations without being excessive, and each tool appears to serve a specific, justified role in the workflow.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set provides good coverage for expense management, including CRUD operations (add, read, update, delete), reporting (monthly_report, daily_average), and utilities (export_csv, health_check). A minor gap might be the absence of a tool for setting or managing budgets, which could limit full lifecycle coverage.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues