Skip to main content
Glama
governance-gateway

governance-gateway

by tanishq-ctrl

Related Servers

Alternatives to governance-gateway

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables inspection and governance of enterprise ingested context by classifying security clearance tiers, sanitizing cross-department prompts, and enforcing role-based access boundaries to prevent data leaks. It runs as a zero-dependency MCP server compatible with Claude Desktop, Cursor, and other agent frameworks.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to resolve routine typed routing, loop-stall arbitration, and tool safety checks locally instead of invoking a frontier LLM, returning schema-enforced decision outputs and telemetry at sub-millisecond latency. Also provides reversible execution checkpoints, token budgets, and decay-based episodic memory for safe, privacy-preserving autonomous operation.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to operate through a local, signed boundary that blocks prompt injection and secret leakage, verifies outputs, preserves cross-session memory, and provides offline-verifiable receipts. It also exposes 900+ MCP tools for discoverable agent actions.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables real-time injection fuzzing, exfiltration canary detection, least-privilege tool sandboxing, and cryptographic audit proofs for untrusted prompts, RAG context, and agent actions over MCP.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to resolve typed routing, loop-stall arbitration, and tool safety checks locally at sub-millisecond latency, avoiding unnecessary frontier LLM calls. It enforces reversible execution checkpoints, token budgets, and decayed episodic memory for safe, privacy-first autonomous operation.
      7
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct role: check_message performs an actual check, governance_status reports aggregate metrics, decision_matrix recommends a policy by load, simulate_load runs comparative simulations, and recent_decisions lists recent records. The only mild adjacency is between status metrics and recent decisions, but their granularity and use cases are clearly different.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The names mix verb_noun (check_message, simulate_load) with noun_noun or adjective_noun phrases (governance_status, decision_matrix, recent_decisions). It remains readable, but there is no predictable verb-first or resource-first convention across the set.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well scoped for a governance gateway: one operational check, one status view, one recent-decisions view, one policy matrix, and one simulation. Each tool has a clear purpose and none feels redundant or excessive.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core lifecycle: checking text, inspecting aggregate and recent outcomes, evaluating policy by load, and simulating alternatives. Minor gaps remain around configuring or updating policies/thresholds and drilling into per-source or per-rule details, but the main workflows are covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues