Skip to main content
Glama
tanbaohui666-hash

橙岛经营底座 MCP

Related Servers

Alternatives to 橙岛经营底座 MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to persist and resume shared working state—tasks, progress, decisions, commands, tests, checkpoints, and handoffs—backed by SQLite while keeping Git authoritative for files and repository state.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible coding agents to persist and retrieve durable project context—such as decisions, preferences, issues, tasks, and notes—locally across sessions without cloud services.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables engineering agents to maintain persistent knowledge across sessions by storing decisions, invariants, gotchas, and rejected ideas, with staleness detection, conflict detection, full-text search, and structured context assembly.
      31
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local stdio MCP server that stores durable project state — goals, validation evidence, decisions, blockers, checkpoints, and scope coverage — in a single SQLite file alongside the repository. It lets a single agent keep working across context windows, compaction, and restarts by resuming from a saved position instead of a larger context, with deterministic guardrails on goal progression and project completion.
      4 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with persistent, local, and shareable project memory by storing decisions and code context in a searchable SQLite index, supporting keyword and semantic search via MCP.
      39 PyPI
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP agents to maintain durable, evidence-aware project knowledge, retrieve precise excerpts on demand, and track decisions, conflicts, and revisions across sessions.
      1
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 20 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    每个工具都有明确的目标资源与动作,如知识搜索、证据添加、决策创建等,彼此边界清晰。即使有类似的如evidence_add和receipt_attach,但描述区分了通用证据与执行回执,不会混淆。

    Naming Consistency5/5

    所有工具都采用动词_名词的命名模式(如knowledge_search, evidence_add, decision_create),且统一使用snake_case,没有混用大小写或风格。虽然project_snapshot为名词组合,但整体模式一致,不影响可预测性。

    Tool Count4/5

    20个工具对于一个经营决策支持系统来说稍多,但每个工具都覆盖了不同的子领域(知识、证据、决策、任务、回执、待补问题),且没有冗余。虽然略高于典型范围,但复杂度需要这么多工具。

    Completeness4/5

    覆盖了核心生命周期:知识管理、证据记录、决策创建与审批、任务创建与更新、回执管理、待补问题追踪。缺少删除操作,但可能是有意的审计保留设计。总体覆盖全面,没有明显阻碍流程的缺失。

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues