Skip to main content
Glama
talkincode

HyperLiquid MCP Server

by talkincode

Related Servers

Alternatives to HyperLiquid MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for the Hyperliquid decentralized exchange, enabling AI assistants to perform trading operations, manage accounts, and retrieve market data.
      307 PyPI
      3
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for Hyperliquid perpetual DEX with 48 tools for trading, monitoring, risk management, and security. Enables real-time market data, order management, risk validation, and automated trading strategies.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      基于通达信行情服务器的 MCP Server,为 AI 助手提供实时 A 股、期货、港股等行情数据及技术指标。
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables natural language control of Hyperliquid perpetual futures, including querying positions, prices, orderbook, and executing trades like market and limit orders, all from MCP-compatible clients.
      13
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      An MCP server implementation that integrates with Hyperliquid exchange, providing access to crypto market data including mid prices, historical candles, and L2 order books.
      3
      11 npm
      44
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for Hyperliquid that provides read-only on-chain wallet analytics. Enables natural-language queries about positions, fills, funding, and realized PnL for any public address.
      8
      7 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 24 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Multiple tools have overlapping purposes: there are three cancel tools (cancel_all_orders, cancel_order, cancel_order_by_client_id), three TP/SL tools (set_take_profit_stop_loss, set_take_profit, set_stop_loss), and close_position vs market_close_position. While descriptions clarify the differences, the boundaries are tight enough that an agent could easily select the wrong tool, especially for closing positions or setting TP/SL.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The vast majority of tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (e.g., cancel_order, get_orderbook, update_leverage). Minor deviations such as market_open_position and market_close_position insert a modifier before the verb, but the intent is still clear and the overall convention is predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    At 24 tools, the server is on the heavy side. The broad domain justifies many tools, but the count is inflated by redundant variants (three cancel tools, three TP/SL tools, five account query tools that could be consolidated. It's not extreme, but it exceeds the ideal 3-15 range and feels heavier than necessary.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the core trading lifecycle: market data, order placement (limit, market, bracket), order modification/cancellation, position management (close, TP/SL), leverage, transfers, and account queries. Minor gaps exist such as fetching a specific order by ID or listing all available coins, but agents can work around these with the existing tools.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues