A
licenseA
qualityD
maintenanceAllows Claude to execute terminal commands on your computer and perform file system operations including surgical code editing with diff-based replacements.
19
158,647 npm
7
MIT
Local Dev Bridge MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Local Dev Bridge MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceGives a Microsoft Copilot Studio agent Claude-Code-style tools to read, edit, search, and run shell commands against your local filesystem.19MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables Claude Desktop or other MCP clients to execute shell commands, read/write files, and list directories on the local machine. Includes basic safety guardrails to block obviously destructive operations.-
- FlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables local file reading and writing for your project via Claude Desktop, with tools to read, write, and list files in a specified root path.71-
- AlicenseCqualityAmaintenanceEnables Claude Desktop to control a local host machine through shell, file, git, network, Docker, package, and system monitoring tools, with approval-gated destructive operations.1461MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables GPT Desktop to interact with local file systems and execute shell commands. Supports file operations (read, write, edit, delete), directory management, file search, and git status checks through natural language.-
TDQS
A3.6/5.0
Scored across 6 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no overlap: edit_file modifies specific text in files, list_directory shows directory contents, read_file reads file contents, run_command executes shell commands, search_files searches text across files, and write_file creates or overwrites files. The descriptions clearly differentiate their functions, making misselection unlikely.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case (e.g., edit_file, list_directory, read_file). There are no deviations in naming conventions, making the set predictable and easy to understand at a glance.
Tool Count5/5
With 6 tools, this server is well-scoped for local development tasks. Each tool earns its place by covering essential file operations (read, write, edit, search, list) and command execution, without being overly sparse or bloated for the domain.
Completeness4/5
The tool surface provides strong coverage for local development workflows, including file CRUD operations (read, write, edit), directory listing, file searching, and command execution. A minor gap is the lack of file deletion or move/copy operations, but agents can work around this using run_command for such tasks.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues