Finish Taisly Agent Setup

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate a mutating but non-destructive operation (readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false). The description adds that the tool saves credentials, which is consistent. However, it does not disclose additional behavioral traits such as side effects, idempotency, or error conditions. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, using only two sentences. The first sentence front-loads the critical condition ('after user approves the loginUrl'), and every word serves a purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (2 optional params, no output schema), the description covers the core purpose and precondition. It is missing details like expected behavior if called prematurely or what the output might be, but it is still fairly complete for its context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with both parameters ('agent' and 'agentId') described in the input schema. The description adds no extra meaning beyond what the schema already provides, so a baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: finishing setup after user approval and saving credentials. It uses a specific verb ('finish setup') and resource ('Taisly agent credential'), effectively distinguishing it from the sibling tool 'taisly_agent_setup_start' which initiates setup.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly tells when to use this tool: after the user approves the loginUrl. It implies the correct sequence relative to 'taisly_agent_setup_start' but does not mention when not to use it or provide alternatives. Still, the context is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.