batman_delete_developer

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden, but it only says 'remove' without disclosing that the deletion is permanent, any cascading effects, or required permissions. It provides no behavioral context beyond the action itself.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short, but this is under-specification rather than concise informativeness. It essentially restates the tool name without earning its place or adding value for the agent.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive delete operation with no annotations, output schema, or parameter descriptions, this description is inadequate. It omits consequences, return behavior, and any conditions, leaving the agent to guess critical details.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single 'id' parameter is not described in the schema or the description; the description does not clarify that the id refers to the developer being removed. With 0% schema coverage, the description fails to add any meaning to the parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Remover um desenvolvedor' clearly states the action (remove) and resource (developer), identifying it as a deletion tool. It distinguishes from siblings by use of the verb 'remover', but it is minimal and closely mirrors the tool name, lacking details like 'permanently' or 'by id'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided about when to use this tool versus alternatives like create, update, or get developer. The description gives no context on prerequisites, exclusions, or situations where another sibling would be more appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.