a2asearch-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to a2asearch-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server that searches 3,800+ open-source AI agents by capability, ranked by real traction (stars, activity). Query it from Claude Desktop, Cursor, Cline, or Windsurf.324 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceAI agent tool discovery and scoring. Search 15,400+ MCP servers, APIs, and CLIs. Check agent-readiness scores before calling any external tool.-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to search a directory of 13,870+ MCP servers, 4,384+ agent skills, and plugins from Remote OpenClaw, returning install commands directly.331 npm4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables searching and retrieving details of 41,000+ agent skills, MCP servers, Claude Code plugins, and agentic loops from any MCP-capable agent.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for discovering Claude Code skills, plugins, and MCP servers by searching 15,000+ resources from 17 registries, GitHub, and the web with zero setup.326 npm3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAI-first MCP server discovery tool that enables agents to search, inspect, and install MCP servers from multiple registries.12AGPL 3.0
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: get_agent retrieves detailed information for a specific agent, list_agents provides a filtered browse of agents by category, and search_agents performs a broader search across the directory. There is no overlap in functionality, making tool selection unambiguous.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (get_agent, list_agents, search_agents) with clear, descriptive verbs and pluralization where appropriate. This uniformity aids in predictability and readability.
With 3 tools, the count is slightly low but reasonable for the server's purpose of searching and browsing agents. It covers core operations (get, list, search), though additional tools like update or delete might be expected if the domain included management capabilities.
The tool set provides comprehensive coverage for searching and browsing agents, with no obvious gaps in this domain. However, it lacks CRUD operations (e.g., create, update, delete), which might be expected if the server also supported agent management, but based on the descriptions, the focus appears to be on discovery.