Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to keystone-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that connects AI agents to a shared organizational knowledge base, allowing them to query company-specific context like pricing, team, and strategy.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that allows coding agents to look up contextual rules and patterns on demand, providing just-in-time guidance for specific tasks like writing tests or authoring UI.
      2
      8
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides coding agents with fully-contextualized work orders from a knowledge graph, enabling them to retrieve and update work order status.
      4 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides coding agents with structured repository context, including graph-based navigation, dependency analysis, runtime flow tracing, and configuration surface across supported stacks.
      183 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 14 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: setup vs. scaffolding specific artifact types vs. querying topics. The overlapping new_sensor/new_script/new_prompt tools are well-separated by their descriptions (sensor wrappers vs. bare scripts/prompts), and the remaining tools target different artifact categories.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The keystone_ prefix and consistent 'new_' pattern for scaffolding tools provide strong consistency. However, keystone_harness_bootstrap and keystone_target_add invert the verb_noun order (noun+verb), which is a minor deviation from the prevailing pattern.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 14 tools, the server is within the ideal 3-15 range. Each tool corresponds to a distinct artifact or operation within the scaffolding workflow, making the count well-scoped and justified.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers the full scaffolding lifecycle: setup, artifact creation for all defined types, target installation, and patch application. Minor gaps include lack of listing/update/delete operations for individual artifacts and no create_topic, but the core workflows are complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues