jgrants-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to jgrants-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that enables LLMs to search and retrieve Japanese government subsidy and grant information via natural language, wrapping the Jグランツ public API.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceRead-only MCP server that searches Japanese government grant information and retrieves subsidy details and attached file content via the J-Grants public API.MIT

jgrants-mcp-serverofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Japan's Jグランツ grant application system, enabling LLMs to search and retrieve subsidy information via natural language.50MIT- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides access to Japan's central and municipal subsidies, covering over 20,000 municipal grants not exposed by official APIs, with tools for search, comparison, citation verification, and practitioner referrals.1322 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides AI assistants with access to over 40 Bank of Japan statistical databases (interest rates, money supply, exchange rates, tankan, etc.) via the BOJ time-series data search API.44 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for the Japan National Tax Agency Corporate Number API, enabling corporate number lookup and search via local AI clients.31MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: list_subsidies searches for subsidies, get_subsidy_detail retrieves detailed information about a specific subsidy, and download_attachment handles file downloads. There is no overlap in functionality, and the descriptions clearly differentiate their roles.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (list_subsidies, get_subsidy_detail, download_attachment) using snake_case. The verbs (list, get, download) are appropriate and predictable, making the set easy to understand and use.
With only 3 tools, the set feels thin for a subsidy management domain, as it lacks operations like creating, updating, or deleting subsidies. However, the tools cover core search and retrieval functions, so it's borderline but not severely mismatched.
The tool set has significant gaps for a subsidy management server. It provides search and detail retrieval but lacks essential CRUD operations (e.g., create_subsidy, update_subsidy, delete_subsidy) and other lifecycle actions like applying for subsidies or managing applications, which could cause agent failures in broader workflows.