action.plan_from_note

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds 'preview-only' which aligns with readOnlyHint=true from annotations, and 'from a note and nearby context' gives behavioral context. However, it doesn't disclose other traits like whether writing or side effects occur, but annotations already cover read-only nature.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that is front-loaded and efficient. Every word adds value: 'preview-only' limits scope, 'from a note and nearby context' explains inputs. No unnecessary filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 5 parameters and no schema descriptions, the description should provide more context on parameters or usage flow. While output schema exists, the description omits details like required path, optional objective, and style options, making it incomplete for selecting and invoking.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so description must explain parameters, but it does not. It only implies 'path' is a note and 'maxRelatedNotes' might control context, but no explicit semantics. The enum 'style' is unexplained. This leaves agents guessing about parameter meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb (create), resource (action plan), and key constraint (preview-only from note and nearby context). It distinguishes this tool from siblings like 'action.handoff_to_repo' and 'context.gather' which serve different purposes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not specify when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor does it mention prerequisites or exclusions. For example, it doesn't indicate that this tool is for planning before execution, or contrast it with other action tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.